Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP4

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

11

18

5

3

1

4

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.6

6.1

2.2

3.7

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

122

47

63

36

66

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Price/value

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Tread pattern comparison

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison