18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Vredestein
Quatrac
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
16
3
Best position
#4
#1
#2
Average position
19.0
3.1
3.7
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
129
88
36

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
Vredestein Quatrac
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison