Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Kleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Hankook

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Dynaxer HP3

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

1

10

3

Best position

#4

#1

#2

Average position

19.0

1.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

129

27

109

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

65%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

88%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

94%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

61%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Comfort

Confidence

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

58%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Kleber Dynaxer HP3

57%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs Michelin Primacy 5

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Dynaxer HP3

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison