18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
4
3
14
4
Best position
#4
#2
#4
#1
#2
Average position
19.0
3.3
4.3
3.6
3.3
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
129
40
99
194
40

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison