18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
6
4
49
24
Best position
#4
#2
#1
#1
Average position
19.0
3.3
3.2
2.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
129
40
213
302

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison