18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Kleber Dynaxer HP3Upper-middle
KleberKleber

Dynaxer HP3

R14 – R19
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
6
4
49
3
24
Best position
#4
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
19.0
3.3
3.2
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
129
40
213
36
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKleber Dynaxer HP3 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKleber Dynaxer HP3 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs Firestone RoadhawkGoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store