18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
6
3
4
18
3
4
Best position
#4
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
19.0
1.3
12.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
129
23
111
47
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
94%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
58%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP3
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store