18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kenda (53%). The first tyre test of Kenda KR41 Emera A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2026 when was the Nokian Powerproof 2 first tested.

Test Profile

Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian
Powerproof 2
Number of tests
2
3
Best position
#7
#6
Average position
13.0
9.0
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
91

Wet

Wet
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
91%
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Wet handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
94%
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
92%
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%

Costs

Costs
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Rolling resistance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
47%
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Dry handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Exterior noise
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison