18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Let's dive into the details of two summer tyres namely: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, both of which are a replacement of their previous models Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance respectively.


The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a Hankook's summer touring tyre, scored an 85% rating in our tests. It excelled in features such as Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Braking, and Aquaplaning - longitudinal, and had a notably low exterior noise. It ranked 6th in the Vibilagare test out of 9 tyres, stood second among 51 tyres in the Autobild test and 9th in the ADAC test out of 50 tyres. However, it has areas to improve, such as the Low Aquaplaning Resistance as well as High External Noise and it showed slightly below-average mileage.


On the other hand, we've the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 - Goodyear's summer tyre offering. This tyre scored a slightly higher rating of 87% in our tests. Its standout features were mileage, Price/Value, and Comfort. In the respective tests, it bettered the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, ranking 4th in the Vibilagare test, 18th in the Autobild test while standing the first in the ADAC test showing its prominence and good performance against a bigger pool of tires. It comprehensively offered strong performance with excellent Wet and Dry Handling, low Noise, and good Levels of Comfort. However, it didn't perform as well in Aquaplaning resistance and Dry Braking.


Summarizing, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ticks the boxes for those aiming for strong handling and braking in both wet and dry conditions, though it fell slightly short on mileage and had higher external noise. The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, whereas, proved to be a very well balanced tyre, offering a comfortable ride with excellent mileage and performed well in handling in wet and dry conditions, but didn't perform ideally on Aquaplaning resistance and dry braking.


Upon comparison, The Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 performs better overall in the tests. But each tyre has its own strengths to offer, making the final decision subjective based on individual preference.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
13
18
10
26
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.2
6.1
6.0
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
530
47
104
66

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
58%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Wet Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
48%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Wet Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
58%
Dry Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
51%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Dry Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Dry Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
32%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Noise Exterior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Noise Interior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Economy
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison