18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
4
18
3
4
3
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
2.8
12.0
6.1
1.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
139
111
47
23
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store