18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Evo has a better rating of 98% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Evo was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Hankook Ventus Evo has A wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 has B rating.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Number of tests
5
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
2.8
12.2
Latest test
2026
2024
Available sizes
139
207

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Price/value
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison