18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
16
4
4
28
3
Best position
#1
#3
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
2.8
5.5
12.0
3.3
2.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
139
153
111
40
67
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store