18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
14
5
3
Best position
#1
#8
#1
#2
Average position
2.8
13.4
4.8
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
139
153
158
36

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison