Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Hankook

Ventus Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Ventus Evo

Advantage

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

5

14

3

Best position

#1

#8

#2

#1

Average position

2.8

13.4

3.7

1.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

139

153

36

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet braking

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Wet handling

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Costs

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Rolling resistance

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Mileage

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Comfort

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Comfort

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Dry

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry braking

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Dry handling

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Advantage

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison