18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
4
5
3
4
28
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
12.0
2.2
3.7
3.3
2.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
66
111
63
36
40
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store