18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
18
28
5
3
4
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
6.1
2.3
2.2
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
66
47
67
63
36
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison