Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Advantage

Roadhawk

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

—

14

21

28

Best position

—

#8

#2

#1

Average position

—

13.4

11.9

2.3

Latest test

—

2026

2024

2026

Available sizes

—

153

165

68

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

Confidence

66%

Gt

Radial Fe2

63%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

75%

Firestone

Roadhawk

80%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

Wet Braking

Gt Radial Fe2

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Continental PremiumContact 7

91%

Wet Handling

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Wet Circle Cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Gt Radial Fe2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Firestone Roadhawk

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

66%

Aquaplaning Cross

Gt Radial Fe2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

66%

Dry Performance

Confidence

66%

Gt

Radial Fe2

74%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

83%

Firestone

Roadhawk

84%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

Dry Braking

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry Handling

Gt Radial Fe2

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Comfort & Noise

Confidence

73%

Gt

Radial Fe2

82%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

56%

Firestone

Roadhawk

64%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

Noise Exterior

Gt Radial Fe2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

56%

Continental PremiumContact 7

64%

Economy

Confidence

70%

Gt

Radial Fe2

72%

BFGoodrich

Advantage

79%

Firestone

Roadhawk

74%

Continental

PremiumContact 7

Rolling Resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

73%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2024	205/55 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Browse by brand

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Radial Fe2

Advantage

Roadhawk

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison