18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GT Radial Champiro FE1 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Test Profile

GT
Radial Champiro FE1
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
5
10
15
Best position
#10
#2
#2
Average position
25.4
6.0
6.1
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
Available sizes
51
109
229

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Indicative only
GT Radial Champiro FE1
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Wet braking
GT Radial Champiro FE1
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Wet circle cornering
GT Radial Champiro FE1
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT Radial Champiro FE1
39%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Wet handling
GT Radial Champiro FE1
30%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT Radial Champiro FE1
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Dry
Indicative only
GT Radial Champiro FE1
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Costs
Indicative only
GT Radial Champiro FE1
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Mileage
GT Radial Champiro FE1
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Comfort
Indicative only
GT Radial Champiro FE1
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Exterior noise
GT Radial Champiro FE1
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Interior noise
GT Radial Champiro FE1
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store