Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Bridgestone (87%). The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: Highly recommended | 352 | 122 | 129 | 101 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||