In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Continental (83%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 93% compared to 90% of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+. The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the WinterContact TS 870 P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 83% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings.
| # | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good
2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.1 | 9.8 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 9.7 | ||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Outstanding | 9.0 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 8.6 | ||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Outstanding | 9.1 | 9.8 | 8.9 | 8.2 | 9.0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Good | 2.4 | 2.3 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good | 2.5 | 2.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 35,5 | 25,5 | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | 1 | ||||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||