18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 (2026)

10 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Continental leads in dry, snow and efficiency; Blizzak dominates when it rains.

Two premium winter tyres from opposite ends of the world, but they compete directly in test after test — and over 17 shared comparisons, it's almost a dead heat: Continental's WinterContact TS 870 P takes 8 wins, Bridgestone's Blizzak LM-005 takes 9. The headline difference is one of character: the Continental is a balanced all-rounder built around dry precision, efficiency and snow confidence, while the Blizzak is a wet-weather specialist that posts some of the shortest wet braking distances in the premium winter segment. Worth noting that the LM-005 has since been succeeded by the Bridgestone Blizzak 6, so fitment availability may vary depending on size.

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Good for
EV and hybrid drivers prioritising low rolling resistance Drivers wanting confident dry and snow performance High-mileage commuters on 17"–22" fitments Those wanting a refined, quiet winter tyre
Not ideal for
Drivers needing the shortest wet braking distances Those frequently driving on ice-covered roads Budget-conscious buyers — it's the pricier option
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Good for
Wet-weather safety as the top priority Drivers in high-rainfall regions Those needing smaller sizes down to R14 Buyers wanting class-leading aquaplaning resistance
Not ideal for
Drivers prioritising dry road braking performance EV owners focused on range and rolling resistance Those wanting strong lateral snow grip and traction

Test Profile

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
29
49
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
3.7
3.2
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
222
244

Performance comparison

Averaged from 10 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Wet Braking
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Wet Handling
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

This is where the Blizzak LM-005 makes its case most forcefully. Across 2 measured wet braking tests, it averages 32.1 metres against the Continental's 34.8 metres — a gap of 2.7 metres that is genuinely significant at speed. In the 2022 AutoBild 215/55 R17 braking test, the Blizzak stopped in 32.8 m to the Continental's 34.6 m; in the 2023 225/45 R18 test, the gap widened to 31.4 m versus 34.9 m. Bridgestone built the LM-005 as a wet specialist, and the data backs that positioning — it earned the highest wet braking score of any tyre in ADAC 2023. Its aquaplaning resistance score of 84.9 also outpaces the Continental's 79.2, which has been flagged for lateral aquaplaning weakness. The Continental is no slouch in wet conditions and earns mostly B EU wet grip labels, but the Blizzak's predominantly A-rated wet grip reflects a genuine performance gap in the rain.

Dry Performance
Confidence
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Dry Braking
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Dry Handling
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Dry Lane Change
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Dry Steering Reaction
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%

On dry tarmac, the Continental holds a clear edge. Its dry performance score of 87.5 versus the Blizzak's 82.4 reflects what testers consistently describe as the sportiest, most precise dry handling in its class — confident turn-in, excellent lane-change stability, and strong braking. The Blizzak, by contrast, carries extended dry braking distances as its most cited weakness across multiple test seasons; testers noted it lacks the last margin of grip at the dry limit. Real-world Continental owners on mixed roads report good dry confidence even in cold conditions. For drivers who regularly encounter dry or semi-dry winter roads, the Continental's dry competence is a meaningful practical advantage.

Snow Performance
Confidence
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Snow Braking
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow Traction
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow Handling
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow Circle Cornering
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

On snow, the two are closely matched — and this is precisely where the Continental reasserts itself. Across 2 shared snow braking tests, the Continental averages 28.0 metres against the Blizzak's 28.6 metres, a slim but consistent advantage. In the 2022 215/55 R17 test the Continental stopped in 25.5 m to the Blizzak's 26.3 m. The Continental's snow handling is praised for reliability and control, and it won the 2023 Autobild SUV snow test outright. The Blizzak shows its limits here: testers noted understeer and modest lateral guidance on snow, and its snow handling scores sit below its wet performance. Both tyres carry broadly similar overall snow scores (77.9 vs 77.6), but the Continental delivers more composed, confidence-inspiring behaviour when conditions get wintry.

Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Noise Exterior
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Noise Interior
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Ride Comfort
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

The Continental is the more refined daily companion. Its overall comfort score of 87.6 beats the Blizzak's 80.6, and its rolling resistance score of 91.7 is exceptional — Continental explicitly positions the 870 P as EV-compatible, and real owners confirm low fuel consumption and quiet running. Surveyed customers highlight low noise as a standout positive, and the tyre earns a 9.8/10 on Heureka across 73 reviews. The Blizzak is noticeably heavier and generates more road noise; ADAC flagged higher wear and lower predicted mileage. Both tyres offer similar predicted mileage scores (around 63), but the Continental's lower rolling resistance gives it a real-world edge for high-mileage and electric vehicle use.

Economy
Confidence
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
70%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Rolling Resistance
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Mileage
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%

Performance spider chart

Tread pattern comparison

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Verdict

For most drivers, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is the more complete winter tyre — it balances dry precision, solid snow performance, exceptional rolling resistance, and everyday refinement in a way few rivals match. It earned our rating of 93/100 for good reason. If you drive an EV, cover high mileage, or want the most rounded performance across all winter conditions, it is the stronger recommendation. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 earns its place on the shortlist specifically for drivers who prioritise wet-weather safety above all else — its wet braking advantage is real and repeatable, and its aquaplaning scores are class-leading. However, given that it has been succeeded by the Bridgestone Blizzak 6, buyers should check whether their size is still available before committing to the LM-005.

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutozeitungAutozeitung
Winter
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/40 R18View
SportautoSportauto
Winter
2023225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/60 R18View
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024235/35 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022245/40 R19View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2022245/45 R19View
AutomotorsportAutomotorsport
Winter
2023255/45 R20View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.