18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
24
10
3
28
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.7
6.0
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
302
109
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet performance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Snow
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snow traction
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Snow braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snow handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snow cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Dry performance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Interior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Offroad
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Ice
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%

Tread pattern comparison

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store