18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
24
3
1
28
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.7
3.7
1.0
2.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
302
36
66
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Snow
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snow traction
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Snow braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snow handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snow cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Dry performance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Offroad
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Ice
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store