18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUVPremium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
—
10
3
5
Best position
—
#2
#2
#1
Average position
—
6.0
3.7
2.8
Latest test
—
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
123
109
36
139

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Viking WinTechGoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Radar Dimax AlpineGoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Apollo Aspire XP WinterGoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs Nexen N blue 4 Season 2Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison