18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
13
24
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
4.3
2.7
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
123
302
36
23

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison