18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
13
29
24
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
4.3
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
123
180
302

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison