18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
4
2
5
3
3
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
2.0
2.8
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
111
48
139
36
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store