18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
4
5
6
3
28
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
2.8
4.7
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
111
139
146
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store