18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
4
1
17
24
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
1.0
1.7
2.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
111
66
80
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store