18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
4
1
17
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
1.0
1.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
111
66
80
63

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store