18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
4
18
5
3
1
5
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
6.1
2.8
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
111
47
139
36
66
63

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison