18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
4
4
6
29
Best position
#2
#3
#3
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
40
111
146
180

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison