18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
3
1
24
3
Best position
#2
#4
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
4.3
1.0
2.7
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
99
27
302
36

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison