18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
10
5
14
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
6.0
2.8
3.6
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
109
139
194
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store