18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
10
18
4
5
1
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
6.0
6.1
12.0
2.2
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
109
47
111
63
66
36

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison