18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
10
3
2
14
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.0
3.7
1.5
3.6
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
109
36
66
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Dunlop Winter
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store