18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
10
17
14
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.0
1.7
3.6
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
109
80
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store