18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
4
10
23
23
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
6.0
6.7
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
109
107
176
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store