18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
4
14
18
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
6.3
6.1
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
532
47
36
23

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison