18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
5
4
24
28
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
2.8
12.0
2.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
139
111
302
67

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison