18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
4
1
4
24
17
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
1.0
12.0
2.7
1.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
27
111
302
80

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison