18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
1
16
5
14
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
1.0
5.5
2.2
3.6
Latest test
2026
2025
2023
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
66
153
63
194

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison