18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
4
18
10
2
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
6.1
6.0
2.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
47
109
48
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store