18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
18
23
15
14
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.1
3.3
3.4
3.6
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
40
47
176
70
194

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison