18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
3
16
3
14
Best position
#2
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
3.7
5.5
1.3
3.6
Latest test
2026
2025
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
40
36
153
23
194

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison