18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
4
23
5
3
2
14
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.7
2.2
3.7
2.0
3.6
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
107
63
36
48
194

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison