18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin Primacy 5

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.6
R16 – R21
Also compare with
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
4
14
5
Best position
#2
#8
#1
Average position
3.3
13.4
4.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
153
158

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
71%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
62%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2026225/50 R17View

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.PrimacyBFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Michelin Primacy 5 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenDunlopGT

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison