18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
14
5
3
28
Best position
#2
#8
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
13.4
2.2
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
153
63
36
67

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison