18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
14
6
3
28
Best position
#2
#8
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
13.4
4.7
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
40
153
146
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry performance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store