18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
14
3
5
28
Best position
#2
#8
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
13.4
3.7
2.8
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
153
36
139
67

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison